Comments...

The article we are talking about is very similar, has the same objectives that PIBID, our project. In spite of they occur in different states and have different names they work in the same way. I’m glad to read about Londrina’s project, the blog, the studies, objectives. It’s good to know that there are people who have the same intention and work in the same way than us.

Talking about the first topic: "The world of life to the world of theory", suggested by Luciana we can realize that make these parts work together is the best way. This relationship between University and public school it’s very relevant specially when happens during the formation of them that want to be a teacher too. In the university we learn the theoretical part of the profession, and in the school we are going to apply what we’ve learned. Without this project the first situation could be happening before the second one and not at the same time like we are having the privilege to try. Through this approach we intend improve teacher’s formation.

The second point mentioned talks about the objectives that the participants of both projects want to reach, and inside of it we can talk about some points, but here we are discussing specifically about exchanging the roles, letting themselves be transformed by each-other and with another person, working collaboratively producing locally meaningful knowledge. When we talk about teacher and student what came on our mind is that the wisdom is something that belongs the teachers, that only them can teach and the student's role is receive what they know. The reason of the approach that propose this project is to change it. When we talk about collaborative work, we are trying to eliminate this hierarchy idea. Everybody has the same role as Ortenzi agrees. All of we fell like teacher independent if at the university we are students yet.

We are learning how to be a teacher, and with this project we are going to be a better teacher than we would be if we hadn’t this experience. We can see it in the article. I read what the participants put in the blog and I realized that I was unaware of the power of this tool. I confess that I’m not using it in the best way that I could. We have a great opportunity of improve this activity and I think that we are not enjoying it.

If we are working together it’s not only to divide the work. This collaboration is more important than we can imagine. We talk about our points and listen our colleague’s points too. With that we can see the situation by another point of view and change our mind a lot of time, re-creating our identities. That’s the goal. It happens because this study is based on the TSCH (Theory Social-Cultural-Historical), third point suggested by Luciana, and according PASSONI “learning occurs through social practice between individuals”. This learning occurs all the time because we always have someone next to us.