My comments

1.The approchement between university and school is extremely important for the construction of knowledge of all involved in this scheme. The fact is that one complements the other, and would have no reason to exist without the other's existence. The university is a place of theoretical knowledge and training the reason it exists is precisely the application of this knowledge in school. The school has a more direct contact with the outcome of this research, because it is not certain that this used in proposals without theoretical foundation. This relationship will only be narrowed when the participants themselves recognize this need, the university teachers entering the classrooms and recognize values ​​required for building the theoretical foundation, and also when the school teachers recognize the importance of research.

2. As Livia, I see that the first topic is talking about to revise the roles of the participants and the hierarchy between them. Considering as teachers in different stages of the parts of formation and mainly as each one is a learning during this experience. The second topic is about the importance of the construction of knowledge with participation of another person and the dependencies of the other  person learn too. Finally, the third refers to the collaborative process is a way of learn in different places without to lose the identity.

3. Really, the experiences inside classroom are interesting and constructive, but, on Monday’s meeting we can divide our experiences, scares, hard situations and to see on our friends, ourselves. Like this every day is better than yesterday.